Abortion as impermissible in javis thomsons text a defense of abortion

But here a related difficulty arises. Something like this, I take it.

Judith Jarvis Thomson:

And on the morrow, when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, "Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee. Everybody must refrain from slitting his throat, everybody must refrain from shooting him--and everybody must refrain from unplugging you from him.

If the doctor refuses, then the woman is denied her right. The first thing to be said about this is that it is something new. On the other hand, this argument would give the unborn person a right to its mother's body only if her pregnancy resulted from a voluntary act, undertaken in full knowledge of the chance a pregnancy might result from it.

And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: Take the case of Henry Fonda again. Suppose you filed yourself trapped in a tiny house with a growing child.

Judith Jarvis Thomson:

Such cases are nowadays very rare, and many opponents of abortion do not accept this extreme view. Suppose a woman has become pregnant, and now learns that she has a cardiac condition such that she will die if she carries the baby to term.

Again, suppose pregnancy lasted only an hour, and constituted no threat to life or health. The difficulty I point to here is not peculiar to the right of life. However, this does not mean that the person being crushed cannot act in self-defense and attack the child to save his or her own life.

Therefore, the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed. Philippa Foota prominent Aristotelian ethicist argued that negative non-provision of service, as in the case of the violinist, is different from active killing, or interference, as in abortion see Foot's book Moral Dilemmas, 86— How, precisely, are we supposed to get from there to the conclusion that abortion is morally impermissible?

Certainly it lets us see that a third party who says "I cannot choose between you" is fooling himself if he thinks this is impartiality.

Judith Jarvis Thomson

Suppose you find yourself trapped in a tiny house with a growing child. Admittedly she did nothing at all which would give the unborn person a right to the use of her body. In some views having a right to life includes having a right to be given at least the bare minimum one needs for continued life.Judith Jarvis Thomson (born October 4, ) is The papers collected in Rights, Restitution and Risk () include discussions of assisted suicide, abortion, self-defense, and consists not in the right not to be killed, but rather in the right not to be killed unjustly." Therefore, to show that abortion is morally impermissible.

Judith Jarvis Thomson (born October 4, ) is The papers collected in Rights, Restitution and Risk () include discussions of assisted suicide, abortion, self-defense, and consists not in the right not to be killed, but rather in the right not to be killed unjustly." Therefore, to show that abortion is morally impermissible.

Judith Jarvis Thomson: "A Defense of Abortion" I. Thomson's Project. Thomson grants for the sake of argument the premise that a human embryo is a person. She challenges the idea that one can argue effectively from this premise to the conclusion that all abortion is morally impermissible.

Judith Jarvis Thomson: A Defense of Abortion.

A Defense of Abortion

they regard abortion as impermissible even to save the mother's life. Such cases are nowadays very rare, and many opponents of abortion do not accept this extreme view. All the same, it is a good place to begin: a number of.

A Defense of Abortion – Judith Jarvis Thomson. As the title makes plain, Thomson argues that abortion is not impermissible.

A Defense of Abortion

More precisely, she argues for the conclusion that abortion is sometimes permissible; she grants that there are scenarios in which obtaining an abortion would be immoral. What is especially novel is the manner in which Thomson. Let us call the view that abortion is impermissible even to save the mother's life "the extreme view." I want to suggest first that it does not issue from the argument I mentioned earlier without the addition of some fairly powerful premises.

Download
Abortion as impermissible in javis thomsons text a defense of abortion
Rated 5/5 based on 8 review